Homebank or GNUCash
location: linuxquestions.com - date: May 8, 2011
I've used GNUCash before and just didn't click with it. Has anyone here used Homebank? I was just wondering how it might compare with GNUCash?
Micro. Money clone: gnucash vs homebank ?
location: ubuntuforums.com - date: September 23, 2010
Which one is the closer to such good Microsoft, and has as much features such as planner, graphs, reports, overview over year?
[SOLVED] Use GnuCash or KmyMoney?
location: linuxquestions.com - date: December 31, 2012
Which personal finance program would you suggest: GnuCash or KmyMoney?
I am currently using Ubuntu version 12.10. I had planned on being further down-the-road in my testing of both products, but alas it is now December 31, 2012. My objective is to dump Quicken.
To get the data out of Quicken and into either GnuCash or KmyMoney, I need to generate a QIF, which turns out to be less than satisfactory. As an editorial aside, Quicken is very hostile when it comes to sharing (exporting/importing) data. In fact, the ability to export/import data from Quicken seems to have been essentially depreciated. A major reason for moving to a Linux based accounting program.
So far, I have only accomplished preliminary massaging of imported data. In terms of testing, it has been easier to import data into GnuCash than into KmyMoney. Last night I was able to ascertain that KmyMoney "chokes" when attempting to import securities. The program crashes. I will be checking into how to resolv
Fedora, Gentoo or Arch?
location: ubuntuforums.com - date: May 28, 2012
This may seem like a strange topic, but out of the three, which one gets your vote?
CentOS, Fedora, or Ubuntu for server. Which is best?
location: ubuntuforums.com - date: May 20, 2008
The title sums it up. And, posting this on an Ubuntu forum, I know beforehand that the answers might be a little biased.
But the gist of it is that I may soon need to set up and periodically administer a box that will be used for subversion, among other things. I've been using Ubuntu since Feisty on might desktop and have loved it overall. My first instinct is to go ahead and load Hardy LTS on the new server, but then again Fedora seems to be the go-to distro for servers.
I realize that Canonical is working hard to make Ubuntu a server household name in its own right with some already evident success, but I know Fedora supposedly has a history of being a strong server platform, and nearly every server I've seen in the past is usually running some form of Red Hat-inspired software.
Come to think of it, I had forgotten about CentOS. How does that stack up?
I haven't really administered a server of any kind before, so I'd appreciate honest assessments of each distr
Ubuntu Server Or CentOS
location: ubuntuforums.com - date: February 20, 2011
Hey guys I am soon to deploy a new server for quite a bit of things such as web serving, Game Servers, and File Hosting. I have one main question is whether to go with Ubuntu Server 10.10 or CentOS 5.5 in terms of reliability, uptime, expandability, and the most professional one to use. It would be great to read some of your opinions. Also if you would like you can also post what you think is the best overall server operating system.... Thank you in advance
ARM Chromebook 13.04 Ubuntu, Xubuntu, or Lubuntu? why?
location: ubuntuforums.com - date: April 15, 2013
Ok so I am thinking of trying to install ubuntu on my arm chromebook when the final 13.04 versions release later this month. I know that there is *supposed to be increased support for the hardware for the 13.04 release (any thoughts on that?). Now my question is this (I am kind of a newbie so bare with me), is there going to be any major differences in support or the installation process for Ubuntu, Xubuntu, or Lubuntu? If the answer is no, then which version would you all recommend? I currently use Xubuntu on a parallels VM and have been very happy with it, but considering the lower system resources of the samsung arm chromebook I am thinking that Lubuntu may be a better alternative. Then again the 12.10 version of the standard Ubuntu release already ran pretty snappy on this hardware according to multiple sources.
So basically thats the question, which version of 13.04 would you install on a Samsung ARM Chromebook... Ubuntu, Xubuntu, or Lubuntu?
in case youre wondering, my require
Arch Linux "vanilla" or LXDE?
location: ubuntuforums.com - date: May 4, 2012
I have done a fresh installation of Arch Linux, this week. I am very happy with my progress, so far. The way I have it now, I boot to a text console, log in, and run startx to go into an OpenBox desktop with a tint2 panel. This is very nice, very simple, and very light on resources.
However, every time I want to do something new, it seems like I have to install something else and learn how to configure it. Yesterday, I discovered that LXDE is basically just OpenBox plus several more applications. The claim is that LXDE is also very light on resource consumption.
So, what is your take on this? Should I continue on my current tack, or add LXDE to maybe make things a little simpler? I want to hear the pros and cons of both approaches.
How to get Debian 7 GNOME Classic or Arch Linux
location: ubuntuforums.com - date: June 28, 2013
I have a Arch linux system that runs GNOME 3.8.2 and another system that runs the new Debian Wheezy 7.1 that came out a few days ago. I really LOVE the GNOME Classic mode that is included on Debian 7.1, and though I use my Arch system most of the time, I prefer the Classic GNOME greatly over GNOME 3.8.2, so I was wondering if it is possible to add the GNOME classic included on debian and put it into Arch. And I don't want to use XFCE as a replacement. So if someone could tell me how to get GNOME classic on arch linux, That'll be great
No such file or directory error
- date: July 22, 2012
I am cross-compiling a program on my PC (12.04) for my beaglebone (12.04 precise armhf). But when I try to execute the program on beaglebone:
bash: ./helloworldtest: No such file or directory
Here are some properties:
:/home/ubuntu/helloworld# file helloworldtest
helloworldtest: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.31, BuildID[sha1]=0xca0159e70b99493764b601a0195ee18be5e29b31, not stripped
:/home/ubuntu/helloworld# ls -la
drwxrwxr-x 2 ubuntu ubuntu 4096 Jul 20 07:51 .
drwxr-xr-x 5 ubuntu ubuntu 4096 Jul 20 07:50 ..
-rwxrwxrwx 1 ubuntu ubuntu 72739 Jul 20 07:42 helloworldtest
I searched net and found out that most of the people who had this problem, had it because they were using 64 bits machine to compile the code but my PC's processor is 32 bits and my beaglebone's is 32bits too.
Also the strange thing
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10